NORWALK — The Norwalk Planning Commission has postponed its debate on the use of synthetic turf to Sept. 22.

In a report to the commission, Planning Manager Bing Hyun said many people are promoting synthetic turf in place natural grass as a water-saving measure.

However, others oppose it and there is a health concern to some.

In either case, city code does not permit the use of synthetic turf. It requires that all homes have some type of natural landscaping in front yards and side yards abutting streets. This could consist of natural grass and shrubs with some flowers but not rows of vegetables.

A similar law governs residential units of four or more apartments and commercial buildings of 2,500 square feet or more.

The use of drought-resistant, native plants is allowed but a new ordinance would be required to allow synthetic turf, Hyun said.

Hyun told the commission last month that options include the staff recommendation to retain the current law, a new definition of landscaping to include artificial turf or a new ordinance.

Synthetic turf has been around since the 1950s but is usually associated with athletic fields. However, it has become more popular for residential and commercial projects as a way to conserve water.

Hyun said the Irvine Ranch Water District in Orange County promotes synthetic turf, estimating that 750 square feet of the material on a lot would save about 22,000 gallons of water a year.

The city of Whittier permits it. So do Lakewood and La Mirada. Bellflower has waived its ordinance calling for natural grass, to allow the use of synthetic turf at one site, in a little traveled area between tall buildings.

On the other hand, artificial turf costs $6 to $10 per square foot as compared to $1.75 to $2.25 per square foot for natural grass sod. In desert regions such as Southern California, Arizona and New Mexico, it is estimated that it would take some five to 10 years to recoup the added cost with synthetic turf through water savings, Hyun said.

There is also a health concern from chemicals used to make synthetic turf.

At a recent meeting, resident Jerry Ori cited a news article about a large manufacturer and supplier of synthetic turf settling a lawsuit with the state, which alleged the firms had violated Proposition 65 by not providing warning labels about the lead content in synthetic turf. The manufacturer has agreed to remove about half the lead from its product, the article said.

In general discussions July 14, Commissioner Lissa Topping Romero said she does not personally like the look of artificial turf and noted that it wears out over a period of years.

Commissioner Scott Collins said he likes the look of synthetic turf and would support it if it results in water savings, but needed more information.

Commissioner Martin Greenidge agreed.

Vice Chairman Delip Sangani called for more information on water savings.
Commission Chairman Ken White said he tends to be against use of artificial turf because of the higher cost.

In other recent action, the commission:

• Voted 3-0 to allow the sale of beer and wine for takeout at the Walgreens Pharmacy, 11930 Studebaker Road.

• Delayed until Aug. 25, at the request of the petitioner, an appeal by Rockie Mooney, 15319 Domart Ave., to keep up to 100 pigeons, 10 chickens and two cows at his home along the San Gabriel River. Zoning there allows horses or other farm animals depending on the size of the lot and other conditions. Mooney said he is working with an architect to provide plans showing the various structures. He is appealing the decision of the Planning Department, which believes the number of birds and animals exceeds city rules.