Bottom Line: Unbowed, a credential-laden candidate eyes a return to voters

Former — and, most likely, future — Inglewood mayoral hopeful James Butts leaves after visiting a voter's home days before a June primary election in which he placed a closed second. (Photo by Gary McCarthy)

By BETTY PLEASANT, Contributing Editor

Tools

Who is James T. Butts Jr.? What makes him want to be mayor of Inglewood and why are entrenched Inglewood officials risking the city’s solvency to stop him?

Butts, who turned 57 last Sunday, ran for a public office for the first time in his life when he sought the truncated Inglewood mayorship in the June primary. At the end of a campaign of less than 58 days, Butts came in second among eight candidates for mayor. He beat out four Inglewood elected officials with a combined tenure of close to 50 years and came within 200 votes of being the outright winner of the contest. If he had another week to campaign, Butts could have easily been the number one vote-getter.

The Inglewood city clerk and city council invalidated Butts‘ candidacy after the election, removed him from the race that had already been run and assigned his 2,471 votes and second place finish to another candidate, Councilwoman Judy Dunlap.

Why? The city clerk maintained after the voting that, because of some kind of paperwork dating controversy, Butts was not qualified to run for mayor, yet, in reality, Butts has a dizzying array of professional qualifications that, frankly, outshines President Barack Obama.

Butts, who has a wife and three children, was born and raised in Los Angeles’ Crenshaw District. He attended 59th Street Elementary, Horace Mann Middle and Crenshaw High schools. From the age of 18, he was firmly embedded in Inglewood, from which he launched a career that is, frankly, phenomenal.

During the period when Inglewood was White and endemic racism was rife, 19-year-old Butts became an Inglewood police cadet and, while obtaining his bachelor’s and master’s degrees in business administration, he became either the fifth or sixth Black police officer hired by the IPD in 1974.

“I had a difficult probation,” Butts said, with a wry smile. “There was a lot of racism in the city to the point that I almost lost my life. I was shot at three times while chasing suspects and was never nominated for an award of valor, and neither was my White partner. But then my partner was shot at during a time when I was not with him, and he was given a valor award.

“That always bothered me, but then, that was what I was dealing with,” he added.

In 1980, the IPD was looking to promote officers into six sergeant positions and Butts applied, aced the written exam and the “outside” oral exam, and his “inside” oral exam was sabotaged by his fellow officers, yet he still scored high enough to be among the six promoted.

“They picked five and when they got to me, they said they had budgetary problems and could not afford to hire six new sergeants,” Butts said.

Annoyed, but undaunted, Butts applied for sergeant the next year and achieved the highest written exam score ever recorded in the IPD, which had eliminated the “inside” oral test, and he and one other brother became the first two Black sergeants in the department. From there, Butts went on to become the first Black lieutenant, first Black motorcycle cop, first Black SWAT team member, first Black captain and only Black deputy chief in the history of the Inglewood Police Department.

When Butts was a lieutenant running special operations for the IPD, he launched a four-month operation to clean up three high crime areas in Inglewood, pursuant to a request of the city’s administrator, so the city would be more amenable to a Raiders football stadium city leaders wanted to lure to Inglewood.

“We had 57 murders in Darby-Dixon (now known as The Bottoms) and we were right in the middle of a violent crack cocaine and gang epidemic,” Butts said. “We sent specialized teams into those communities which acted as ombudsmen for city services and in three months we had arrested 969 people and violent crime had dropped 29 percent in the next quarter.

“Community-based policing kind of resonated after that. The task force and I got an award for that; then I was promoted to captain,” Butts added. In fact, between 1980 and 1990, Butts was promoted five times.

In 1990, Butts was promoted to deputy chief of the IPD and a year later the cities of Santa Monica and Pasadena came calling for him to head their police departments.

“I had never thought of leaving Inglewood,” Butts said. “I had always believed — hoped — I’d be chief of the IPD some day, but I took the test for Santa Monica believing I would never get it because it was a nationwide recruitment for a very sought-after position.”

He took the test. The same week Santa Monica called and told him he was that city’s number one selection, Pasadena called and arranged his final interview for its top cop position.

“I told Santa Monica I would have to think about their offer,” Butts said. “I’d been in Inglewood since I was a 19-year-old cadet and I didn’t want to leave. Inglewood was all I wanted; it was all I knew and I just couldn’t see myself leaving Inglewood.”

After being counseled on his quandary by several friends, including actor Truman Jacques, Butts left Inglewood and started his job as Santa Monica’s first and only African-American chief of police just days after his 30th birthday — which was very young for a police chief.

Santa Monica was a city at a crossroads: it had development projects going and was seeking to sop up some of the cachet and money of Hollywood, yet it had a fierce homelessness problem (to which it turned a blind eye), a murderous cocaine den in its midst called Palisades Park, violent street gangs and a property crime rate that was off the chart — even higher than Inglewood’s.

Butts applied the tactics he used in Inglewood to Santa Monica and 120 days after he got there, his cops arrested 800 people with more than a 90 percent conviction rate and cut the aggregate crime rate by 64 percent to its lowest level since 1954.

Butts was two years past retirement when he left the Santa Monica PD and the city of Los Angeles came knocking at his door. L.A. was shocked about a series of news stories that poked fun at the security of the city’s airports. Los Angeles went to him and said “Please, please, please. Come and beef up the security at our four airports.” Butts said: “OK.”

In less than 3-1/2 years under Butts, the airports went from being a laughingstock in the news to being rated number one in aviation security by the Transportation Security Administration by the time he left at the end of 2009. 

In his airports position, Butts handled a $116 million budget, compared to the $88 million general fund budget adopted this fiscal year in Inglewood. He had 1,100 employees on his payroll, compared to the 733 Inglewood has now. As chair of the Airport Security Advisory Committee and as airport security coordinator, Butts had functional control of more than 4,000 security counter terrorism and security assets that protected the airports — customs border protection, Highway Patrol, LAPD, TSA, LAX police, Secret Service, Coast Guard.

Butts’ supporters noted that he was the only person running for mayor who actually ran anything, let alone three complex multimillion dollar organizations in three different cities — two of which are international cities.

“That is why city officials are working so frantically to keep him from running for mayor,” said Charles Gyden, an active 30-year Inglewood resident and president of the 78th Place Block Club. “They know that he is much better qualified then they and they are afraid he will do a much better job then they. They are afraid of his exposing their lack of good administrative skills.

“Because, at this point, the city is going to hell in a hand basket,” said Gyden, who has been in private practice as a physical therapist in Inglewood for 25 years. “No definitive work projects have been initiated by the current city council since Mayor’s Dorn’s forced resignation. They are afraid Butts will change that.”

And that’s why Butts says he wants to become mayor — to change that by giving his hometown the benefits of his vast and proven administrative skills.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Concerned Citizen said on Sunday, Oct 17 at 11:15 AM

Tabor took office and immediately hired a convicted felon as his assistant. That says it all!! Convicted felons running the City Of Inglewood. What poor judgment !!! Anyone who wants more of the same will vote for Tabor. If you care about Inglewood Butts is the only choice.

53983221
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Mr. Real said on Sunday, Oct 17 at 11:02 AM

Anyone that chooses to think that Tabor will solve the city of Inglewood's problems is delusional. Stop and think about it. What has Tabor done in life? What has he done for the city of Inglewood? Butts on the other hand promoted through the ranks of the Inglewood Police Department. He was selected over numerous other candidates to become the Deputy Chief. He reduced crime and managed a large budget. He then competed with numerous candidates and was selected to be the head of security at LAX. The former Executive Dir of LAX, Paul Haney said of Butts "he came and did a fine job." Individual opposing Butts claim he is pompous, arrogant, and egotistical. The truth is it does not matter, Inglewood needs a person that can get the job done and Butts has demonstrated the potential to do just that. I ask again what had Danny done? This election is about leadership and results, not making sure the good old boy gets rewarded for giving Inglewood nothing but lip service.

53982697
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

resumes said on Wednesday, Sep 1 at 9:20 AM

Resumes don't tell the entire story! don't be fooled by Butts. he's scum of the earth.

51052611
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

educated said on Saturday, Aug 28 at 9:31 AM

I'm sorry but if you lineup Tabor and Butts' resumes Butts blows Tabor out the water. You always go with the better talent, both have issues. Inglewood's biggest roadblocks are crime and the graffiti and blight that come with that. It is rather obvious Inglewood would be purged of the I13, Bloods, 18th street, etc. if this man wins. This is a no brainer. Wake up Inglewood, cut your allegiances to someone who has done nothing on the council for years. edward vincent- the last great mayor of that South Bay town.

50802226
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Focus said on Thursday, Aug 26 at 1:31 PM

yes, let's focus on the future. The Future is not electing an arrogant, pompous and egomaniac such as Jim Butts. If the man will lie about his residence, there's no telling what level this guy will stoop to if given real power. He and Dorn are buddies and that tells us all we need to know. When you lay with dogs, you get fleas. Well we all know Dorn is a convicted criminal and he's the one who backs Butts. Butts refused to sign a simple statement of when he moved into his in-laws guest room because he knows he'd be hit with fraud charges. How does a man who collects a $215,000 pension claim he lives in his in-law's guest room? Either he's bad with his own money management (as some accuse tabor of) or he purposely is skirting the system in order to run for mayor. This piece of garbage isn't worth the paper to print the ballots on. Anyone who votes for Butts will regret it within 6 months when he's brought in his own cronies like he did at LAX and squanders what's left of a budget.

50684166
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Butts in November!!! said on Wednesday, Aug 25 at 4:38 PM

Let's focused on the real problem here in Inglwood, Tabor, Franklin, Dunlap and Morales. Butts in November!

50615041
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

4thDistrictNative said on Wednesday, Aug 18 at 7:29 PM

@ Concerned, woud you agree that we live in a city where gangs rule and blight is everywhere? Do you think Tabor will fix that? I'm currently here on my porch on 112th and Yukon, if you know where that is, and the beach breeze is beautifully flowing over here. There is so much untapped potential in this city. I hope whoever wins can get rid of the graffiti and gangs, because there are good people here but the entire city gets a reputation of crime and idiots. Maybe this is what democratic agendas do. I don't know anymore. I love this city. I just want to see it beautified and revitalized and ridden of gangs and crime, that's why I consider Butts. Tabor has never responded to my emails or calls.

50116786
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Kasha James said on Wednesday, Aug 18 at 4:25 PM

Join a group of angry Inglewood residents as we prepare to sue James Butts for wasting the city of Inglewood's time and money. He unlawfully filed to run for office and he knew he was breaking the law. emailme jameskasha@aol.com

50108391
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Simone said on Wednesday, Aug 18 at 4:24 PM

I am voting for Tabor, so is everyone else in my home and block. We want him because we believe in him and know he is the best person for the job

50108331
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Concerned said on Wednesday, Aug 18 at 3:09 PM

4th District, A Mayor actually has more power than City Council when it comes to enacting policy and procedures. Council just approves programs and contracts that the Mayor's staffs have put together. With that said, Dorn was a thief and helped ruin our city. Now Dorn backs Butts in back room dealings and you think Butts will save the day? Tabor will finally be on the real side of being able to institute and implement change. Butts is another Dorn lackee. If we elect Butts, we might as well bring Dorn and all his crooked ways back. I'm voting Tabor!

50104886
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

4thDistrictnative said on Tuesday, Aug 17 at 10:07 PM

I went to South LA today to film for my project in college. It was quite possibly the worst place I have ever seen.Then i remembered something. The Imperial and Prairie Corridors aren't much different. Gang stickers on all the streets and stop signs/ buisnesses. The council members have FAILED Inglewood. Perhaps you all should google the story on the breeze that came out yesterday. inglewood council members get paid the most in the south bay.look at our streets and look at the homicide report, is that really where our money should be going? tabor and butts both have question marks, but to me, Butts has a much more impressive record. Why would I vote for someone who has done nothing for this city. I believe in Butts, I believe he will fix Inglewood as he did Santa Monica. Silly concerned citizen, there is already nothing left of our city!

50047081
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

concerned citizen said on Tuesday, Aug 17 at 10:50 AM

Butts will ruin what's left of the city if elected. His pompous, arrogant, and 'holier than thou' attitude is excatly what our city does NOT need to get back on its feet. Butts only stayed within his budget at LAX because the entire Budget Office made it so. If it was his choice, he would have went into the RED millions of dollars. He will do the same in Inglewood. He wants to build a huge shopping mall/complex at Hollywood Park? good luck! I wonder who will be lining his pockets if that deal would to ever go through. With Dorn backing Butts, we can only expect more illegal shenanigans. Butts already lies about his own residence. Just imagine what he will lie and scheme about if given the power of our next mayor. Tabor is our only logical choice for mayor. He will actually make decisions based on the good of the entire city, not about his future golden parachute like Butts is only concerned about. Butts - stay in Ladera and mind your own business.Leave the citizens of Inglewood alone!

50012981
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

IngleHOOD native said on Tuesday, Aug 17 at 5:45 AM

Thanks to the current councilmembers, our city is going down fast. I am still not sure why any of the current councilmembers feel qualified to be mayor. Maybe we should recall them like the city of Bell is doing and start over fresh with new blood. I see why Mr. Butts campaign the less but received the second highest votes, and this time I will vote for me as well!!!

49989886
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

No More Butts! said on Wednesday, Aug 11 at 7:38 AM

Butts has the biggest ego of any person in Inglewood (or Ladera Heights).He squandered tons of LAX's money buying little gadgets for himself and his command staff.He talks about Inglewood needing his economic experience, but fails to mention that he was so fiscally irresponsible at Los Angeles World Airports (LAX).He requested a helicopter at his beckon call and a shower be built into his office. Fortunately for LAX and its pocket book, both requests were denied, but that goes to show how this man thinks and spends other people's money. This man is so polarizing to all staffs he has overseen. 1 of his 4 right hand men at LAX was turned away in shame from a TSA nomination (for abusing federal databases for personal use - google "Erroll Southers"). Another chief he hired at LAX, William Thompson(a former Inglewood Lt.)was forced to resign in shame after a scandal at LAX. Butts will kick out every incumbent if elected and hire his personal goons. Don't be fooled by this disgraceful man!

49610079
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

NoodlesonImperial said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 11:42 PM

@Jewel of the South Bay? Where dod you hear that phrase? It hasn't been used in decades. You see, Inglewood used to be exactly that before white flight happened. I wonder why?

49584737
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 7:35 PM

"InglewoodisScrewed" this is Willie Agee writing this comment. How do we know? your misspelling is always the same. We are waiting for you to keep your promise and move out of Inglewood. Go to LaDera with Butts

49578719
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tsk! Tsk! said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 7:31 PM

For 'changing my votes for butts' your sentence 'he resently moved back to Inglewood' says it all. He resents this city so much that even while working here he was NEVER involved in any community events. Stay in LaDera and run for the unincorporated Mayor there.

49578524
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

No Good Candidate said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 10:13 AM

It's true every candidate has his/her issues, but Butts gets off on the wrong foot immediately by proving he's shady with this residence fiasco. If he lies about this, what will he do when he's responsible for millions of the city's dollars? Will he take bribes, hire his old cronies from santa Monica that failed at LAX, blow through his budget in less than a year like he did every year at LAX?Butts can't be trusted. Let him ride into the sunset with his $218K pension and leave our city alone! Everywhere he's been, he's had a multitude of discrimination and sexual harassment allegations against him. Not only in his professional life, but his personal life as well. If Ms. Pleasant is going to do an op-ed piece on Butts, maybe she should include the man's "not-so-good" record. Every word in this slanted article was praise. How about doing some research and presenting both sides of the man - the arrogant and deceitful side of Butts! Gotta love subjective journalism. I'm voting for Tabor!

49542637
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Aced the exams? said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 9:52 AM

Ms. Pleasant, did you fact find anything Butts told you? Do you have proof he aced all these exams during his career? Butts knows there's no way to verify these records (being decades old) that he makes these stories up that he's the greatest thing since slide bread. The same racism he no doubt encountered as an officer, he still holds a grudge for these days. The huge majority of promotions he handed out in Santa Monica and at LAX were to black males. He had tons of discrimination charges against him at both organizations (including sexual harassment charges from females). Butts is NOT someone I want leading my entire city let alone my police force. He lies about living with his in-laws even though he legally changed his address just to be able to run for Mayor, and is a pompous, arrogant, and egotistical man. He'll make some superficial changes if elected, but won't solve any deep rooted problems. Tabor is our only hope at this point. Butts is worthless and another empty promiser.

49540924
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Jewel of the South Bay? said on Tuesday, Aug 10 at 9:43 AM

IF Inglewood was ever the "jewel" of the South Bay, I seriously doubt it will ever return to that distinction no matter who is Mayor. The only way to solve the homicide rate is to beef up with more cops. That's no secret - just as Bratton did in L.A. How is any mayor going to balnace the budget deficit AND hire more cops to reduce the violent crimes? Butts blew through his budget at LAX within the first few months all 3 years he was there. He tried to bully the IT Divsiion at LAX to pay for all his Information Technology toys (new radios, segways, etc) since he didn't budget well enough for his own division. And some of you think he will balance Inglewood's problems while promising new shopping centers and senior centers? Seems to me he's snwoing people just like he did when he got the job at LAX. And for the record, Butts says LAX begged him to come in, but it was the excat opposite. Butts BEGGED LAX for the job and then was forced to resign after 3 1/2 short years. This man lies.

49540282
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Let'sRoll said on Monday, Aug 9 at 5:53 PM

check the homicide report on the internet and click inglewood. 80 murders since 07, we need a police chief like Butts for mayor to clean house like he did in Santa Monica. there is hope for the former jewel of the south bay.

49493239
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

TheWoodCanBeSaved said on Monday, Aug 9 at 5:49 PM

for a sobering read google the homicide report on la times and go to the Inglewood page. 80 murders in the last 3 years. despicable. we need someone to come in here and clean the kitchen. Who better than a police chief that turned Santa Monica around? there is hope for the jewel of the south bay!!

49493014
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Dunlap if not Brown said on Monday, Aug 9 at 5:42 PM

Wanda Brown is a hard worker and should have be appointed mayor to save Inglewood money. Butts has residency issues and Tabor is lazy, financially irresponsible (listed in Wanda Brown's flyer) and is rumored to have some serious "personal issues" that is causing his financial problems. Judy Dunlap has always "kept it real" and will be getting my vote!!! Butts would be my second choice, and never Tabor.

49492559
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

InglewoodisScrewed said on Monday, Aug 9 at 1:31 PM

I live in the fourth district. I have lived here for 40 years. Tabor has never returned a call or email. The entire council is inept. This morning I drove around and there was graffiti on every wall on 109th and 110th and Yukon between crenshaw. Our biggest problem are MURDERS AND GANG CRIME. I don;t care where Butts lives, we need new blood and I just have a feeling he would clean this city of gangs, if that happens perhaps this city could be great again. It hurts me to say that I live in the Cesspool of the South Bay.

49478694
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Anonymous said on Monday, Aug 9 at 12:03 PM

Betty Pleasant, how dare you purposely mislead readers by stating that Butts' 2,400 votes were assigned to another candidate? Either this was an outright lie or you need to re-visit government civics. Shame on you!

49472278
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Tabor All The Way said on Monday, Aug 9 at 10:12 AM

So many people post that tabor has personal financial troubles. Nobody has any proof of this. And who are we to judge someone on their personal finances (maybe he has been supporting extended family members who have medical bills). There could be tons of explanations for this IF it's true. Butts, however, may be well off personally with his $218,000 pension from Santa Monica, but that does not personify the type of person he is. Butts is an egotistic, arrogant man. He never listens to any opinion that differs from his own (won't even consider it). He has had numerous sexual harassment claims against him at santa Monica and at LAX and if you want to get "personal" (like the anti-Tabor voters out there), then look at Butts' personal life. His first wife filed sexual child abuse against him years ago. Again, stop making unsupported accusations against Tabor unless you want to open the door on Butts' personal life. I'd rather have Tabor than Butts based on personal background. Vote Tabor!

49463718
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

MorningsideParkResident said on Saturday, Aug 7 at 2:00 PM

@shorty yeah, a swell job. you know, with them shooting at everyone and recently investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice. yup. Butts is the answer, I think he has a hell of a shot at winning.

49371683
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Changing my vote(s) for Butts said on Friday, Aug 6 at 11:02 PM

All of this talk about Butts not being the right choice to serve as mayor for Inglewood is crazy. So what he resently moved back. Tabor, Franklin, Dunlap and Morales have lived here forever and a day and just look at our city. $15 million dollars in debt, and according to an admission by Tabor at the recent debate, councilmembers knew about the budget issues 22 months ago, BUT DID NOTHING? Now I could be wrong, but if leaders who live here can't do their job, Butts has the background, experience and history of fixing problems, voters are tired of the same old politicians, especially policians that show signs of having severe financial personal problems, my wife and I, and my mother are voting for Butts, Tabor would take Inglewood under water with his criminal sidekick and felon friend LaCrecia, Butts in November!

49341338
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Shorty said on Friday, Aug 6 at 5:10 PM

Hey MorningsideParkResident, we need a Mayor, we already have a great police chief who is quietly and methodically doing her job without the ego issue. Maybe you and Butts should consider moving to Culver City where they will be looking for a chief real soon.

49328949
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Up To Here! said on Friday, Aug 6 at 5:07 PM

Viters be aware! There is some dirty tricks being played on you. Of course you know that whatever you read in Betty's column is slanted towards her partner-in-crime, Dorn and all his cronies. You'd think she'd be fair and objective by telling the truth, right? NAH! That's ok, we just witnessed what happened to Alcaron and they will do the same to him....No ifs, ands or BUTTS about it! Mark my word.

49328848
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

MorningsideParkResident said on Friday, Aug 6 at 11:32 AM

Butts is the answer. period. What's Inglewood's worst problem? Crime, graffiti, and gang activity. No wonder that city is in shambles, the people keep voting for losers.

49312299
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Basic Math said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 6:01 PM

That should be "aptly named". Also, Ms. Pleasant - you might check into the number of reverse discrimination lawsuits the City of Inglewood has endured over the last 15-20 years, before you make the charge of rife racisim. It has gone both ways - neither was right.

49258874
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Basic Math said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 5:56 PM

Ms. Pleasant - the numbers for Mr. Butts don't add up. If he has hired as a police officer in 1974 - at age 21, in 1991 - when SMPD came calling, he would have been 38, not 30. So what else doesn't add up in your story. Or, more aptly names, Butts For Mayor Press Release. Does any fact checking go on at the Los Angeles Wave?

49258599
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Pleasant is biased said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 3:11 PM

I went back and googled Ms. Pleasant's articles. She is so biased towards Butts. There is no objectivity in her reporting, which is exactly how Butts operates. He acts like it's everybody else's fauly and a conspiracy that he was disqualified based on his residency issue. Simply put, the man did not file in time and then tried to lie about it. He does, in fact, make $218K from CALPERS and will undoubtedly milk the city of Inglewood if elected. He says he can't be bought because he already has money, but don't buy his rhetoric. He is self-serving and will sell Inglewood down the river if he knows he can further his own personal agenda. He begged LAX for the position, not vice versa. Maybe Ms. Pleasant should have asked other sources at LAX/LAWA about this or the executive that hired Butts in the first place. Just how much of the b.s. above did Butts make up? It's incredible the subjective reporting. This was an editorial and not an objective fact report. Shame on you Ms. Pleasant.

49250819
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Highly Favored said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 1:02 PM

Jesus Christ is my savior, not Officer Butts, I saw him at an event in Inglewood and I asked him where he lived. He spoke as if he had only visited the place once or twice. I have serious doubts about his integrity and credibility at this point. He can no longer get my vote.

49243044
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Butts is getting rich off of Tax Payer Money Right NOW said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 11:28 AM

Butts is number 14 on the highest paid CALPERS pension recipients - right after Bell and Vernon. $220,000 per year for life without doing anything else for anyone! And he is a LIAR!!!!

49236289
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Skewed Story said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 10:09 AM

How much did Butts pay the author of this article? wow! how about showing ALL sides of Butts. The officers at Santa Monica overwhelmingly despised him. LAX Officers got ONE divisional speech from Butts in 3 1/2 years because he thought it was beneath him to come into contact with his rank and file. He's had numerous sexual harassment charges filed at santa Monica and at LAX; 3 out of the 4 assistant chiefs he hired at LAX (whom he had worked with in Inglewood and Santa Monica) have resigned in shame. He was constantly begging other divisions at LAX for addditional funds because he was burning overtime like a wildfire (even though he claimed to reduce OT by 300%). And to top it off, he refused to sign a simple affidavit about his true residence. He knew he'd be opening himself up to felony fraud charges had he done so, so he simply spun the lies into saying he didn't want to drag Inglewood into a legal battle. Wake up people. Butts is a fraud! VOTE TABOR!

49230113
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

2nd District said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 9:42 AM

I will not vote for anyone who lies, and get disqualified for failing to sign an affidavit. I want the best candidate, who cares and has the knowledge to run our city

49227974
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Santa Monica said on Thursday, Aug 5 at 8:39 AM

Is it me, or is there something to be said about a person who would "retire" from a job making over $250,000 and turn around and LIE about his residence just to run for a position making less but have the potential to steal like his#1 advisor DORN? If you know anything about Inglewood politics, this whole episode is scripted by the master of confusion, Dorn. He preys on the seniors to make them think he's God and has their best interest at heart, all the while stealing and plotting. The game is OVER. You have been exposed so take all your puppets and dangle them from your 'new sunroom!"

49222709
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

USCProfPoliSci said on Wednesday, Aug 4 at 10:12 PM

I am only going to say this once. I have connections to the City of Inglewood, and I am telling everyone right now that if this man wins in November, Inglewood should rejoice and prepare for their home values to skyrocket. This man will clean the armpit of the South Bay and make it respectable again. Your councilman Tabor would be an unwise decision. It has been proven over and over again, that old blood does nothing for a city. Butts' track record speaks for itself. Alas, there is hope in Inglewood. That place is a gem, so much potential dying to be unleashed. Here's your savior hand delivered by Jesus himself, Inglewood.

49191724
Inappropriate? Alert Us!

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

Los Angeles Wave and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

On Demand

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.